Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square

Democratic Republic of Congo
4,848 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau
4,588 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
131st
Guinea-Bissau rank
132nd

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
-2.0k02.0k4.0k198220012021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 4,848 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 260 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 84.57 current US$ per square kilometre 122.08 current US$ per square kilometre 37.51 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 1,528 current US$ per square kilometre 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre 360.08 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 3,866 current US$ per square kilometre 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre 722.3 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 4,848 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,588 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
260 current US$ per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 131st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guinea-bissau/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,795 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.