Bangladesh vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square

Bangladesh
1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark
1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bangladesh rank
19th
Denmark rank
16th

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) … square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Denmark
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197519982021

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 408,250 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Denmark ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 16th of 175 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Denmark Difference Ahead
1970s -1,749 current US$ per square kilometre 107,379 current US$ per square kilometre 109,127 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 22,220 current US$ per square kilometre 88,589 current US$ per square kilometre 66,369 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 48,659 current US$ per square kilometre 259,022 current US$ per square kilometre 210,364 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 139,722 current US$ per square kilometre 536,983 current US$ per square kilometre 397,261 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 492,687 current US$ per square kilometre 930,366 current US$ per square kilometre 437,679 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 271,150 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square, Bangladesh or Denmark?
Denmark, at 1.52 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square between Bangladesh and Denmark?
408,250 current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Denmark?
46 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2021.
How do Bangladesh and Denmark rank globally for adjusted savings: net national savings (current us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 19th and Denmark ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-national-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/denmark/">Bangladesh vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,795 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.