Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
0.0%
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
1.9%
in 2021
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
33rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234197019952021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.9% against 0.0% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 1.9%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 55.2 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 33rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 3.3% 3.3% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0% 3.2% 3.2% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0% 2.0% 1.9% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.9% against 0.0% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.9%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 33rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.