Lower middle income vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Lower middle income
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 3.0% against 0.3% in Lower middle income, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 10.5 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 47 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Lower middle income or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 3.0% against 0.3% in Lower middle income as of 2015.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Lower middle income and South Sudan?
- 2.7%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Lower middle income and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Lower middle income ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.