Lithuania vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Lithuania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 112th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.6% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Lithuania or Uruguay?
- Lithuania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uruguay as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Lithuania ranks 112th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.