Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Liechtenstein or Turks and Caicos Islands?

Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Liechtenstein as of 2021.

What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Liechtenstein and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Turks and Caicos Islands?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Liechtenstein vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Liechtenstein

0.0%

in 2019

Turks and Caicos Islands

0.0%

in 2021

Liechtenstein rank

100th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

97th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

Liechtenstein
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.8 times Liechtenstein's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Liechtenstein ranks 100th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 97th of 185 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Liechtenstein or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Liechtenstein as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Liechtenstein and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Liechtenstein and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?: Liechtenstein ranks 100th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 97th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liechtenstein vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/liechtenstein/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/liechtenstein/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Liechtenstein vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit: % of GNI
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.