Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Kiribati
0.0%
in 2021
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.0%
in 2021
Kiribati rank
82nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
84th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00.050.10.15197019952021

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Kiribati ranks 82nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 84th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 4 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kiribati
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kiribati
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kiribati
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Kiribati or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Kiribati, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
44 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Kiribati ranks 82nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 84th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/kiribati/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/kiribati/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.