Iceland vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Iceland
- Qatar
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Qatar, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.7 times Qatar's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 110th and Qatar ranks 111th of 185 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Iceland or Qatar?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Qatar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Iceland and Qatar?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Iceland ranks 110th and Qatar ranks 111th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.