Guatemala vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Serbia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Guatemala, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Guatemala ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.