Egypt vs Libya: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Egypt
- Libya
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Libya, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.5 times Libya's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 64th and Libya ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Egypt or Libya?
- Egypt, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Libya as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Egypt and Libya?
- 0.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Libya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Libya rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Egypt ranks 64th and Libya ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.