Ecuador vs Iceland: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Ecuador
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Ecuador or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Ecuador and Iceland?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Iceland rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Ecuador ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.