East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0%
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
1.9%
in 2021
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
29th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234197019952021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.9% against 0.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 1.9%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 45.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2% 3.3% 3.1% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.1% 3.2% 3.1% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.9% against 0.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.9%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sao-tome-and-principe/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.