East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.9%
in 2021
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
30th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030197019952021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.9% against 0.0% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 1.9%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 45.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 1.1% 1.4% 0.2% Zimbabwe
1980s 1.3% 1.8% 0.5% Zimbabwe
1990s 0.8% 3.7% 2.9% Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2% 8.2% 8.0% Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1% 3.2% 3.1% Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0% 2.1% 2.0% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.9% against 0.0% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
1.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.