Cuba vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 69th and Georgia ranks 71st of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Cuba or Georgia?
- Cuba, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Cuba and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Cuba ranks 69th and Georgia ranks 71st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.