Congo vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Congo
3.1%
in 2021
South Sudan
3.0%
in 2015
Congo rank
17th
South Sudan rank
18th
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Congo
- South Sudan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.1% against 3.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Congo or South Sudan?
- Congo, at 3.1% against 3.0% in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Congo and South Sudan?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Congo and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Congo ranks 17th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.