Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0%
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
1.9%
in 2021
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
31st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234198920052021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.9% against 0.0% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1.9%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 50.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 31st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 3.3% 3.3% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0% 3.2% 3.2% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Central Europe and the Baltics or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.9% against 0.0% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.9%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 31st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.