Bhutan vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Bhutan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.6% against 2.6% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.3% | 2.9% | 3.5% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 1.9% | 1.4% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 2.6% | 0.9% | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 2.8% | 0.2% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bhutan or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 2.6% against 2.6% in Bhutan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Bhutan and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Bhutan ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.