Belgium vs Greece: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Belgium
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Belgium, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 92nd and Greece ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Greece in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Belgium or Greece?
- Greece, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Belgium as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Belgium and Greece?
- 0.0%, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Greece?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Belgium and Greece rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Belgium ranks 92nd and Greece ranks 91st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.