Bangladesh vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Bangladesh
- Georgia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 68th and Georgia ranks 71st of 185 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Bangladesh or Georgia?
- Bangladesh, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Bangladesh and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Georgia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
- How do Bangladesh and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Bangladesh ranks 68th and Georgia ranks 71st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.