Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Mauritius?

Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritius as of 2021.

How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mauritius?

36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Aruba

0.0%

in 2021

Mauritius

0.0%

in 2021

Aruba rank

98th

Mauritius rank

99th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

Aruba
Mauritius

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Mauritius ahead.

Aruba ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 99th of 185 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Mauritius
1990s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Mauritius
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Mauritius
2010s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Mauritius
2020s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Mauritius?: Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritius as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Mauritius?: 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mauritius?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Mauritius rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?: Aruba ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/aruba/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/aruba/mauritius/">Aruba vs Mauritius: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit: % of GNI
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.