Aruba vs Iraq: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Aruba
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Aruba, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.5 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Iraq ahead.
Aruba ranks 98th and Iraq ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iraq |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Aruba or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Aruba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Aruba and Iraq?
- 0.0%, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Iraq?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Iraq rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Aruba ranks 98th and Iraq ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.