Armenia vs Samoa: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Armenia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Armenia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Samoa ahead.
Armenia ranks 51st and Samoa ranks 49th of 185 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Armenia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Armenia and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Samoa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Samoa rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Armenia ranks 51st and Samoa ranks 49th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.