Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Zambia
0 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th
Zambia rank
113th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zambia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019952021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 30,821 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th and Zambia ranks 113th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 1,042 current US$ 57.01 million current US$ 57.01 million current US$ Zambia
1980s 1,949 current US$ 114.43 million current US$ 114.43 million current US$ Zambia
1990s 6,018 current US$ 209.20 million current US$ 209.19 million current US$ Zambia
2000s 9,578 current US$ 427.98 million current US$ 427.97 million current US$ Zambia
2010s 37,555 current US$ 25.25 million current US$ 25.21 million current US$ Zambia
2020s 34,672 current US$ 0 current US$ 34,672 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zambia?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
30,821 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th and Zambia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/zambia/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.