Serbia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Serbia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 30,821 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.65 million current US$ | 13,136 current US$ | 2.63 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6.28 million current US$ | 37,555 current US$ | 6.24 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 34,672 current US$ | 34,672 current US$ | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Serbia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 30,821 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Serbia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Serbia ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.