Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Papua New Guinea
520.63 million current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
516.33 million current US$
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
19th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019952021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 520.63 million current US$ against 516.33 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.31 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 48.77 million current US$ 47.19 million current US$ 1.58 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 116.61 million current US$ 109.07 million current US$ 7.54 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 205.33 million current US$ 194.52 million current US$ 10.81 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 240.76 million current US$ 278.69 million current US$ 37.93 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 571.21 million current US$ 533.27 million current US$ 37.94 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 527.35 million current US$ 501.70 million current US$ 25.66 million current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 520.63 million current US$ against 516.33 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
4.31 million current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Papua New Guinea ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.