Montenegro vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Montenegro
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 8.06 million current US$ against 7.48 million current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 580,260 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 77th and Saudi Arabia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.04 million current US$ | 4.21 million current US$ | 4.83 million current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 3.92 million current US$ | 9.13 million current US$ | 5.21 million current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 8.25 million current US$ | 7.67 million current US$ | 573,990 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Montenegro or Saudi Arabia?
- Montenegro, at 8.06 million current US$ against 7.48 million current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Montenegro and Saudi Arabia?
- 580,260 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Saudi Arabia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Montenegro and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Montenegro ranks 77th and Saudi Arabia ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.