Micronesia, Federated States of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Micronesia, Federated States of
72,110 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
109th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 72,110 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 41,289 current US$.

That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 2.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 109th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.

Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 24,888 current US$ 6,206 current US$ 18,682 current US$ Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 40,857 current US$ 9,578 current US$ 31,279 current US$ Micronesia, Federated States of
2010s 98,783 current US$ 37,555 current US$ 61,227 current US$ Micronesia, Federated States of
2020s 77,004 current US$ 34,672 current US$ 42,332 current US$ Micronesia, Federated States of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Micronesia, Federated States of or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 72,110 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Micronesia, Federated States of and Turks and Caicos Islands?
41,289 current US$, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Turks and Caicos Islands?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 109th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/micronesia-fed-sts/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/micronesia-fed-sts/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.