Mauritania vs Tajikistan: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Mauritania
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 67.82 million current US$ against 64.32 million current US$ in Mauritania, a difference of 3.49 million current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Mauritania ranks 53rd and Tajikistan ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.34 million current US$ | 81,165 current US$ | 10.26 million current US$ | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 50.39 million current US$ | 31.75 million current US$ | 18.64 million current US$ | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 60.98 million current US$ | 65.13 million current US$ | 4.15 million current US$ | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Mauritania or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 67.82 million current US$ against 64.32 million current US$ in Mauritania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 3.49 million current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Mauritania and Tajikistan rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Mauritania ranks 53rd and Tajikistan ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.