Maldives vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Maldives
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 240,007 current US$ against 200,105 current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 39,902 current US$.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 101st and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43,968 current US$ | 20,854 current US$ | 23,113 current US$ | Maldives |
| 2000s | 77,664 current US$ | 84,804 current US$ | 7,140 current US$ | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 193,723 current US$ | 205,224 current US$ | 11,502 current US$ | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 194,162 current US$ | 230,480 current US$ | 36,319 current US$ | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Maldives or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 240,007 current US$ against 200,105 current US$ in Maldives as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Maldives and Turkmenistan?
- 39,902 current US$, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Turkmenistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
- How do Maldives and Turkmenistan rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Maldives ranks 101st and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.