Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Malawi
530.35 million current US$
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
520.63 million current US$
in 2021
Malawi rank
17th
Papua New Guinea rank
18th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Malawi
  • Papua New Guinea
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019952021

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 530.35 million current US$ against 520.63 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 9.72 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 17th and Papua New Guinea ranks 18th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 43.68 million current US$ 48.77 million current US$ 5.09 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 84.98 million current US$ 116.61 million current US$ 31.63 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 190.86 million current US$ 205.33 million current US$ 14.47 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 278.48 million current US$ 240.76 million current US$ 37.72 million current US$ Malawi
2010s 527.83 million current US$ 571.21 million current US$ 43.37 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 514.17 million current US$ 527.35 million current US$ 13.18 million current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
Malawi, at 530.35 million current US$ against 520.63 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
9.72 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Malawi ranks 17th and Papua New Guinea ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/malawi/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/malawi/papua-new-guinea/">Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.