Liechtenstein vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Liechtenstein
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 118,807 current US$ against 102,891 current US$ in Liechtenstein, a difference of 15,916 current US$.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Liechtenstein's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 107th and Qatar ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Liechtenstein averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 169,286 current US$ | 38,233 current US$ | 131,053 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2000s | 321,013 current US$ | 63,434 current US$ | 257,579 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 274,015 current US$ | 166,928 current US$ | 107,087 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 96,428 current US$ | 123,335 current US$ | 26,907 current US$ | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Liechtenstein or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 118,807 current US$ against 102,891 current US$ in Liechtenstein as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Liechtenstein and Qatar?
- 15,916 current US$, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Qatar?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Liechtenstein and Qatar rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Liechtenstein ranks 107th and Qatar ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.