Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Kiribati
90,059 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Kiribati rank
108th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Kiribati
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019952021

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 90,059 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 59,238 current US$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 2.9 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 108th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 6,971 current US$ 1,042 current US$ 5,929 current US$ Kiribati
1980s 13,267 current US$ 1,949 current US$ 11,318 current US$ Kiribati
1990s 29,139 current US$ 6,018 current US$ 23,121 current US$ Kiribati
2000s 48,074 current US$ 9,578 current US$ 38,496 current US$ Kiribati
2010s 120,878 current US$ 37,555 current US$ 83,323 current US$ Kiribati
2020s 96,584 current US$ 34,672 current US$ 61,912 current US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Kiribati or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Kiribati, at 90,059 current US$ against 30,821 current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
59,238 current US$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Kiribati ranks 108th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.