Kiribati vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Kiribati
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 102,891 current US$ against 90,059 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 12,832 current US$.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Kiribati ranks 108th and Liechtenstein ranks 107th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,186 current US$ | 169,286 current US$ | 137,100 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2000s | 48,074 current US$ | 321,013 current US$ | 272,939 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 120,878 current US$ | 274,015 current US$ | 153,137 current US$ | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 96,584 current US$ | 96,428 current US$ | 156.05 current US$ | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Kiribati or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 102,891 current US$ against 90,059 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Kiribati and Liechtenstein?
- 12,832 current US$, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Liechtenstein?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Kiribati and Liechtenstein rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Kiribati ranks 108th and Liechtenstein ranks 107th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.