Italy vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Italy
- Nepal
How they compare
Italy currently reports 210.09 million current US$ against 178.86 million current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 31.23 million current US$.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.
Italy ranks 38th and Nepal ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2010s | 10.33 million current US$ | 97.13 million current US$ | 86.80 million current US$ | Nepal |
| 2020s | 198.87 million current US$ | 176.26 million current US$ | 22.61 million current US$ | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Italy or Nepal?
- Italy, at 210.09 million current US$ against 178.86 million current US$ in Nepal as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Italy and Nepal?
- 31.23 million current US$, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Nepal?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Italy and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Italy ranks 38th and Nepal ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.