Iceland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Iceland
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 30,821 current US$ against 27,386 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 3,435 current US$.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 112th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52,161 current US$ | 38,140 current US$ | 14,021 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2020s | 25,494 current US$ | 34,672 current US$ | 9,178 current US$ | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Iceland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 30,821 current US$ against 27,386 current US$ in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 3,435 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Iceland ranks 112th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.