Guinea vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Guinea
727.28 million current US$
in 2021
Malawi
530.35 million current US$
in 2021
Guinea rank
14th
Malawi rank
17th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Guinea
  • Malawi
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197019952021

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 727.28 million current US$ against 530.35 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 196.93 million current US$.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 17th of 186 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 92.18 million current US$ 43.68 million current US$ 48.50 million current US$ Guinea
1980s 162.90 million current US$ 84.98 million current US$ 77.92 million current US$ Guinea
1990s 251.53 million current US$ 190.86 million current US$ 60.67 million current US$ Guinea
2000s 357.85 million current US$ 278.48 million current US$ 79.37 million current US$ Guinea
2010s 632.47 million current US$ 527.83 million current US$ 104.64 million current US$ Guinea
2020s 705.87 million current US$ 514.17 million current US$ 191.70 million current US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Guinea or Malawi?
Guinea, at 727.28 million current US$ against 530.35 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Guinea and Malawi?
196.93 million current US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Guinea ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/guinea/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/guinea/malawi/">Guinea vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.