Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Guinea-Bissau
170.87 million current US$
in 2021
Nepal
178.86 million current US$
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau rank
41st
Nepal rank
39th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Nepal
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019952021

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 178.86 million current US$ against 170.87 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 7.99 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st and Nepal ranks 39th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 14.54 million current US$ 0 current US$ 14.54 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1980s 31.89 million current US$ 0 current US$ 31.89 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1990s 51.75 million current US$ 0 current US$ 51.75 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 85.60 million current US$ 0 current US$ 85.60 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 175.31 million current US$ 97.13 million current US$ 78.17 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 165.27 million current US$ 176.26 million current US$ 10.99 million current US$ Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?
Nepal, at 178.86 million current US$ against 170.87 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
7.99 million current US$, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st and Nepal ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/guinea-bissau/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/guinea-bissau/nepal/">Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.