Guatemala vs Lithuania: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Guatemala
0 current US$
in 2021
Lithuania
0 current US$
in 2021
Guatemala rank
113th
Lithuania rank
113th
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Guatemala
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Guatemala ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.85 million current US$ | 78.97 million current US$ | 24.12 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 58.19 million current US$ | 11.88 million current US$ | 46.31 million current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Guatemala or Lithuania?
- Guatemala, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 0 current US$, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Guatemala ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.