Georgia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Georgia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 10.11 million current US$ against 9.92 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 181,360 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Georgia ranks 72nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.28 million current US$ | 2.83 million current US$ | 454,705 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2000s | 8.17 million current US$ | 4.11 million current US$ | 4.06 million current US$ | Georgia |
| 2010s | 11.88 million current US$ | 9.92 million current US$ | 1.96 million current US$ | Georgia |
| 2020s | 10.85 million current US$ | 9.64 million current US$ | 1.20 million current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Georgia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Georgia, at 10.11 million current US$ against 9.92 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Georgia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 181,360 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Georgia ranks 72nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.