Eswatini vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Eswatini
112.57 million current US$
in 2021
Namibia
106.20 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
44th
Namibia rank
46th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Eswatini
  • Namibia
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019952021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 112.57 million current US$ against 106.20 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 6.37 million current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 46th of 186 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 15.45 million current US$ 4.35 million current US$ 11.11 million current US$ Eswatini
1980s 37.51 million current US$ 9.12 million current US$ 28.40 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 43.09 million current US$ 15.42 million current US$ 27.67 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s 47.22 million current US$ 34.17 million current US$ 13.06 million current US$ Eswatini
2010s 106.41 million current US$ 79.73 million current US$ 26.68 million current US$ Eswatini
2020s 110.71 million current US$ 100.38 million current US$ 10.32 million current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Eswatini or Namibia?
Eswatini, at 112.57 million current US$ against 106.20 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Eswatini and Namibia?
6.37 million current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/eswatini/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/eswatini/namibia/">Eswatini vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.