Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Eswatini
112.57 million current US$
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau
170.87 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
44th
Guinea-Bissau rank
41st

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M197019952021

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 170.87 million current US$ against 112.57 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 58.30 million current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 15.45 million current US$ 14.54 million current US$ 917,014 current US$ Eswatini
1980s 37.51 million current US$ 31.89 million current US$ 5.62 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 43.09 million current US$ 51.75 million current US$ 8.66 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 47.22 million current US$ 85.60 million current US$ 38.38 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 106.41 million current US$ 175.31 million current US$ 68.90 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 110.71 million current US$ 165.27 million current US$ 54.56 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 170.87 million current US$ against 112.57 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
58.30 million current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.