Eritrea vs Luxembourg: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Eritrea
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 5.08 million current US$ against 3.71 million current US$ in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.37 million current US$.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 84th and Luxembourg ranks 85th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.21 million current US$ | 3.63 million current US$ | 39.57 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 26.61 million current US$ | 5.02 million current US$ | 21.59 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 7.23 million current US$ | 7.23 million current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 4.87 million current US$ | 4.16 million current US$ | 712,495 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Eritrea or Luxembourg?
- Eritrea, at 5.08 million current US$ against 3.71 million current US$ in Luxembourg as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Eritrea and Luxembourg?
- 1.37 million current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Luxembourg?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
- How do Eritrea and Luxembourg rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Eritrea ranks 84th and Luxembourg ranks 85th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.