Equatorial Guinea vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 236.78 million current US$ against 236.21 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 568,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 152.85 million current US$ | 263.69 million current US$ | 110.84 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 230.27 million current US$ | 229.57 million current US$ | 705,000 current US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Equatorial Guinea or South Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 236.78 million current US$ against 236.21 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 568,000 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.