Equatorial Guinea vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Equatorial Guinea
236.78 million current US$
in 2021
Peru
265.10 million current US$
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
35th
Peru rank
33rd

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Peru
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019952021

How they compare

Peru currently reports 265.10 million current US$ against 236.78 million current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 28.32 million current US$.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and Peru ranks 33rd of 186 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Peru Difference Ahead
1970s 5.31 million current US$ 57.57 million current US$ 52.26 million current US$ Peru
1980s 13.39 million current US$ 85.67 million current US$ 72.28 million current US$ Peru
1990s 38.30 million current US$ 122.16 million current US$ 83.85 million current US$ Peru
2000s 65.84 million current US$ 143.53 million current US$ 77.69 million current US$ Peru
2010s 143.58 million current US$ 347.86 million current US$ 204.28 million current US$ Peru
2020s 230.27 million current US$ 268.05 million current US$ 37.77 million current US$ Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Equatorial Guinea or Peru?
Peru, at 265.10 million current US$ against 236.78 million current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
28.32 million current US$, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Peru rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 35th and Peru ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/equatorial-guinea/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/equatorial-guinea/peru/">Equatorial Guinea vs Peru: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.