El Salvador vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

El Salvador
153.78 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini
112.57 million current US$
in 2021
El Salvador rank
42nd
Eswatini rank
44th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • El Salvador
  • Eswatini
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M197019952021

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 153.78 million current US$ against 112.57 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 41.21 million current US$.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 44th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 17.83 million current US$ 15.45 million current US$ 2.37 million current US$ El Salvador
1980s 27.07 million current US$ 37.51 million current US$ 10.44 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 56.04 million current US$ 43.09 million current US$ 12.95 million current US$ El Salvador
2000s 74.58 million current US$ 47.22 million current US$ 27.36 million current US$ El Salvador
2010s 196.04 million current US$ 106.41 million current US$ 89.63 million current US$ El Salvador
2020s 170.73 million current US$ 110.71 million current US$ 60.02 million current US$ El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, El Salvador or Eswatini?
El Salvador, at 153.78 million current US$ against 112.57 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between El Salvador and Eswatini?
41.21 million current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Eswatini?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do El Salvador and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
El Salvador ranks 42nd and Eswatini ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/el-salvador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/el-salvador/eswatini/">El Salvador vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.