Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion

Ecuador
0 current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
30,821 current US$
in 2021
Ecuador rank
113th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
111th

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time

  • Ecuador
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019952021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 30,821 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 49.02 million current US$ 1,042 current US$ 49.02 million current US$ Ecuador
1980s 112.12 million current US$ 1,949 current US$ 112.12 million current US$ Ecuador
1990s 184.76 million current US$ 6,018 current US$ 184.75 million current US$ Ecuador
2000s 106.91 million current US$ 9,578 current US$ 106.90 million current US$ Ecuador
2010s 30.35 million current US$ 37,555 current US$ 30.31 million current US$ Ecuador
2020s 0 current US$ 34,672 current US$ 34,672 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Ecuador or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 30,821 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
30,821 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Ecuador ranks 113th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/ecuador/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-current-us/ecuador/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Ecuador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 8,842 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.