Cyprus vs Mongolia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Cyprus
0 current US$
in 2021
Mongolia
0 current US$
in 2021
Cyprus rank
113th
Mongolia rank
113th
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Cyprus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 719,606 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 719,606 current US$ | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 597,645 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 597,645 current US$ | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 90,570 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 90,570 current US$ | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Cyprus or Mongolia?
- Cyprus, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Cyprus and Mongolia?
- 0 current US$, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mongolia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Cyprus and Mongolia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Cyprus ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.