Cuba vs Slovenia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Cuba
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 90.61 million current US$ against 68.83 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 21.78 million current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 50th and Slovenia ranks 49th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.38 million current US$ | 32.29 million current US$ | 17.09 million current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 39.63 million current US$ | 40.52 million current US$ | 891,960 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 77.63 million current US$ | 89.45 million current US$ | 11.82 million current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 74.19 million current US$ | 93.22 million current US$ | 19.03 million current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Cuba or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 90.61 million current US$ against 68.83 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Cuba and Slovenia?
- 21.78 million current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Slovenia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Cuba and Slovenia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Cuba ranks 50th and Slovenia ranks 49th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.