Croatia vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Croatia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 112.57 million current US$ against 104.98 million current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 7.59 million current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Croatia ranks 47th and Eswatini ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.20 million current US$ | 43.77 million current US$ | 40.57 million current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 45.15 million current US$ | 47.22 million current US$ | 2.07 million current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 121.10 million current US$ | 106.41 million current US$ | 14.70 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 103.90 million current US$ | 110.71 million current US$ | 6.80 million current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Croatia or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 112.57 million current US$ against 104.98 million current US$ in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Croatia and Eswatini?
- 7.59 million current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Eswatini?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Croatia ranks 47th and Eswatini ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.