Croatia vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Croatia
- Cuba
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 104.98 million current US$ against 68.83 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 36.15 million current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.5 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Croatia ranks 47th and Cuba ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.20 million current US$ | 49.38 million current US$ | 46.17 million current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 45.15 million current US$ | 39.63 million current US$ | 5.52 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 121.10 million current US$ | 77.63 million current US$ | 43.47 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 103.90 million current US$ | 74.19 million current US$ | 29.71 million current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Croatia or Cuba?
- Croatia, at 104.98 million current US$ against 68.83 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Croatia and Cuba?
- 36.15 million current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Cuba?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Cuba rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Croatia ranks 47th and Cuba ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.